Jeff Ross

Jeff Ross

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 1,891 through 1,920 (of 1,978 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Word Association #26849
    Jeff Ross
    Participant

    Buoy

    in reply to: Word Association #26847
    Jeff Ross
    Participant

    Buy

    in reply to: Word Association #26844
    Jeff Ross
    Participant

    Thrifty

    in reply to: Poem #26843
    Jeff Ross
    Participant

    Pure brilliance, Brooke, to end it in such a way as to ensure that it wasn’t an awkward love poem.

    in reply to: Poem #26830
    Jeff Ross
    Participant

    I was reading this and thinking that it would have made more sense to write Matthew Bird in as the love interest in “Once Upon a Time, Part 1” until I got to the https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ

    That’s when I fully understood this poem. Genius!

    in reply to: Nintendo #26825
    Jeff Ross
    Participant

    Is this where Masøn will give his review of his new Switch?

    in reply to: Friday, September 1, 2017 #26819
    Jeff Ross
    Participant

    Ausgezeichnet!

    in reply to: Word Association #26818
    Jeff Ross
    Participant

    Cash

    in reply to: The Inner Circle #26816
    Jeff Ross
    Participant

    I think that the Inner Tube Episode 182 comment section strengthened the #CaseForKumquat. It really did.

    in reply to: Word Association #26812
    Jeff Ross
    Participant
    in reply to: Friday, September 1, 2017 #26811
    Jeff Ross
    Participant

    I concur!

    in reply to: Random Thoughts #26810
    Jeff Ross
    Participant

    Good summary of what I wrote, Josiah. Your brevity is to be commended.

    in reply to: Word Association #26806
    Jeff Ross
    Participant

    Telephone

    in reply to: Friday, September 1, 2017 #26804
    Jeff Ross
    Participant

    It’s a very polite thing to do. 🙂

    in reply to: Word Association #26803
    Jeff Ross
    Participant

    Melody

    in reply to: Random Thoughts #26801
    Jeff Ross
    Participant

    Here’s a few things, Kristen:

    1. Remind Kaitlyn that it is difficult to do most things when blinking extremely fast. In order to blink extremely fast, you have to apply most of your focus, concentration, and energy upon blinking. Your family is neither mentally nor physically handicapped for struggling with that attempt to multi-task.
    2. You and your sister should know that “retarded” is not a word to be used under any contexts in modern society. It’s original use has been replaced by the word “autistic” in most situations and its slang use is excruciatingly demeaning.
    3. Why is your sister (or anyone else in your family) blinking extremely fast in the first place, especially while trying to eat? [Not a rhetorical question; I am actually curious as to the circumstances surrounding this unusual inquiry.]

    Pardon me for not understanding why someone would unnecessarily insult their own family for the sake of a cheap laugh from an acquaintance on the internet. {Seriously, speaking excessively derogatorily of your relatives and then saying “hugs and love” to a creature on the internet you barely know? That kind of crass foolishness is beyond the acceptable level of trolling that you should post to the internet, Kristen, let alone the Not-Forum. #Unpresidential}

    Before you respond, please read Proverbs 27:5-6, Proverbs 9:8, & Proverbs 15:1-2 so that this situation does not escalate further. Thank you.

    in reply to: Word Association #26731
    Jeff Ross
    Participant

    Pound sign (#)

    in reply to: Word Association #26614
    Jeff Ross
    Participant

    Car

    in reply to: Once Upon a Time, Part 1 #26581
    Jeff Ross
    Participant

    We interrupt this increasingly fantastical tale to bring you an important message:

    “Wow, what a cliff-jumping cliffhanger. Has someone ever said “I am not your lover” to you? Are you looking for someone to love in spite of your, ahem, “shortcomings”? Hi, I’m Ryan Matlock, and I’m here to bring you a message of hope. Did you know that there are creatures out there who are looking for someone to love, just like you are? Does that sound tube good to be trube? Well, it’s not. Let me introduce you to the Infatuation Station™! For just two payments of $16 per week, you can have unlimited access to our patented, luxurious, state-of-the-art automated kiosk that lets you meet people as desperate for romance as you are. Here’s how it works: Sign up over the phone with your credit card information and address, and we’ll make sure that the Infatuation Station™ is somewhere in your world and time dimension. Download our newly updated app for iphone, android, or Windows Phone to locate where the Infatuation Station™ is at any particular moment. Fly down cliffs, trek over valleys, fall into holes, or walk 30 miles between meatloaf restaurants until you reach your destination station. Then we’ll pair you up with someone who probably won’t mind your personality and behavioral “quirks”. Once you have a match, you will be sent a Facebook friend request so that you two can be friends on Facebook. Then go home and stalk away, totally adoring the fact that someone as insane as you are took the time to send you a friend request, and that you can learn about them without having to make your father disappear. Once you’ve learned enough about that person to know that you may not want to date them after all, come on back and we’ll pair you up with someone new. Who knows? You might even find someone that you’re remotely interested in, or better yet, isn’t “turned off” by your “questionable history”.

    And, if you call in within the next 16 seconds, we’ll let you download the app for half-price! That’s right, only half-price! This app not only lets you locate the Infatuation Station™, but it also gives you discounts for Ryanair plane tickets, which is great if you forgot to prepare your own personal flying device ahead of time. So what are you waiting for? Call now!”

    Announcer: Call 1-877-555-SCAM to sign up for the Infatuation Station™! Meeting your new Facebook friends in-person is not guaranteed. We are not responsible for any headache, heartache, hassle, expense, spiders, butterflies, apocalypses, or donkeys that you encounter from attempting to use our services.

    “Don’t keep reliving romantic nightmares with procrastination station. Start pursuing your dreams again by signing up for the Infatuation Station™ today!”

    We now return you to your regularly scheduled increasingly fantastical tale, already in progress.

    (To me it seemed like a cliffhanger where a guy just jumped off a cliff was the perfect moment for a Ryan Matlock commercial. Hopefully you can spot all the differences from the commercial on page four, as well as the customization station that this commercial underwent to fit better with the plot so far.)

    in reply to: Kerfuffle Planning #26576
    Jeff Ross
    Participant

    Greetings to every F.A.C.E.!

    With the release of Episode 182, the Inner Tube Episode 180 Comment Kerfuffle is officially over. No new comments were made since my last update, so I shall not re-post the stats. Episode 179 was more successful, but Episode 180 still ranks in the top 5 all time for Inner Tube comment sections, even if you ignore all of the comments that I made. Thank you to everyone who took the time to comment on both episodes. This was a different style of Kerfuffle than the previous ones y’all have done, but one more befitting to the Inner Tube podcast. You are still welcome to post comments on either episode, but I will not be updating statistics for doing so.

    Now that the Inner Tube Kerfuffles are over, it will be a while until the next Comment Kerfuffle. Be sure to leave suggestions on this thread of where, why, and when to kerfuffle next.

    Sincerely,

    Jeff Ross
    Trube Fan
    F.A.C.E.
    Still waiting on a few F.A.C.E.s to read the TOPHAT thread and suggest a title for me

    in reply to: Word Association #26524
    Jeff Ross
    Participant

    Robes

    in reply to: BREAKING NEWS UPDATES (#5) #26523
    Jeff Ross
    Participant

    Brilliantly done. Dankeschön for sharing that with us, Josiah! 😀

    in reply to: Word Association #26514
    Jeff Ross
    Participant

    pyrrhic

    in reply to: Word Association #26464
    Jeff Ross
    Participant

    Latin

    in reply to: Once Upon a Time, Part 1 #26463
    Jeff Ross
    Participant

    (This was a fascinating development, but it is a bit tricky to follow how much of it is progression in the story arc and how much of it is flashback. At first glance [or “Glanz” if you will], this section seems to be 90% flashback.)

    in reply to: Word Association #26458
    Jeff Ross
    Participant

    Latvia

    in reply to: TOPHAT #26457
    Jeff Ross
    Participant

    Then again, we could go the other way by saying “The Official Wordsmith for The TOPHAT Officials”, emphasizing “The” each time with a flourish in order to focus the listener’s attention to the title’s validity and exclusivity simultaneously. (This would be similar to people who say that they attended “The Ohio State University” instead of “Ohio State University” [which you may hear if the players announce their own starting line-ups for an NFL television broadcast; it may sound pretentious, but it actually is the official name of that particular university].)

    in reply to: Word Association #26453
    Jeff Ross
    Participant

    Spies

    in reply to: Once Upon a Time, Part 1 #26452
    Jeff Ross
    Participant

    (I just realized that Josiah’s comment of “RIP this thread” wasn’t in parentheses.)

    in reply to: TOPHAT #26373
    Jeff Ross
    Participant

    I thought of a word that might work better in a title than simply “Speechwriter”. I know that there is no official governmental position with this word in the title, but it might be something that could fit within the context of TOPHAT. The word is: “Wordsmith”.

    No obligation to use this word, but I thought it might be a good word to consider.

Viewing 30 posts - 1,891 through 1,920 (of 1,978 total)
The Aux Cable